It's galling the way Urban Treatment Center is staying by it's position that EL Jais' termination was justified. As the courtroom looms, they are so confident that the charges will be dismissed. I've become so upset , I've taken to performing Internet searches that return undecipherable law documents to give me comfort. After all my reading, you know what I think? Urban treatment needs to wipe that smug smile off their face.
Urban Treatments argument goes that only men can watch other men pee ; Therefore a necessary qualification for the position of urine monitor is that one is a male. The U.S labor code, and New Jersey's, allows for some positions to have specific requirements for sex if it's necessary for the business to run. So, Urban Treatments practice of male only monitors for males is theoretically fine; The court hearing El jais case is going to have to determine whether a male only qualification for monitoring males urine is necessary to the operation of Urban Treatments Business.But does Urban Treatment have the authority to define what constitutes a male?
They seem to think so, judging by the careful questioning they gave El Jai. Judging by their questions on his surgeries , Urban Treatment Center has the most common Phallic centered definition of male. But the answer is no , they have no authority to say what constitutes a man. That authority lies with the State.
By every Federal and legal document El Jai is a man . Birth certificate , drivers license social security all the documents that define our persons, all of them attest El Jai is a male. In fact, it was those very documents that Urban Treatment used as identifying papers to hire El Jai. So if the State says El Jai is a male, and they have the authority to do so.....Then El Jai must be male.
Starting to feel that smile crack a little Urban Treatment Center?
No comments:
Post a Comment